In this module you'll learn a much easier and safer strategy that will still improve your rankings but which will also likely help you much more in the long run. If you have any questions feel free to discuss them here.
Having trouble with your marketing? Wish you could have an experienced direct-to-fan marketing expert look over your actual campaigns, music, or content and offer feedback? Or perhaps you’re just looking for a little one-on-one assistance so you can ask questions that pertain to your specific goals and get a second, more experienced, perspective? Click here to book a session with me now.
Hi John,
Thanks for another detailed training.
I have a question:
When you talk about an authority white hat site, could that be my band website/blog? I recently launched a new site for my band. It’s just a regular band website and blog built on the thesis wordpress theme. I’m using the blog for casual posts about our gigs and also other non-music related interests of ours (like food) and will be posting short video guitar, mandolin and drum lessons and other ideas as they come along. Does it make sense to try and build white hat SEO for this kind of site? Or are you only talking about sites that appeal to an entire genre? If I build SEO for this site, could certain blog posts be optimized to be found with keywords specific to those posts and would overall SEO help each post?
Here’s the url to my site: http://hobbyhorseband.com/
PS: I think a live webinar would be great!
Hey John: thanks for doing the update. I've really been wondering what to do post-penguin, and it's great to have a solid plan to start to execute.
I didn't see any link to download the slides you used in the module below the video, though. It'd be pretty helpful to have those to refer to. Did I just miss it?
Thanks!
"Radio Nowhere? What the hell is that? We wanted him to be a lawyer" — My Mom
Okay, so she didn't like it. But you just might! Loud guitars, award-winning songwriting, and visits from the devil.
Check it out and pick up a free EP here..
Hi John,
Managed to catch your training on post-Penguin SEO. I've been grappling with this issue as well as I'm working with a half dozen different clients in different markets when all of the changes came in.
Right now I'm leaning towards ultra-squeaky clean white hat stuff. Mainly, just creating high quality content and letting the links take care of themselves.
For anyone who wants to experiment with buying links...as John states repeatedly - don't point them directly to your money site. Even if you have a micro-site that you're willing to sacrifice to see how well a particular service works, I'd still recommend pointing the links to a site that is pointing to your micro-site. If say you had a posterous or tumblr account that points to your micro-site, you can point your links to the tumblr or posterous site and since they are trusted by Google they're less likely to be penalized by a few suspicious links.
Just my two cents - I'm being extra cautious these days with search engine stuff. The best recommendations I have is to create the best content that you can, keep building your list and sending them to your great content and diversifying so that you're not depending exclusively on Google to deliver all your traffic. Get podcast traffic, Youtube traffic, PDF sharing site traffic etc.
Thanks John for sharing this very timely info and all the resources. Hardcore Troubadour looks very promising!
Thanks guys. Mike Baker: I'll get those up for you shortly. I was being lazy... doh! Good to know they mean something to at least some people.
Annie, an authority site is really any site that you are using to dominate a "market" as apposed to a keyword. But it's also more loosely used to describe a site that you really care about, fill up with a lot of content, and use to build customers and a general community around.
You can absolutely view any content rich site as an authority site and try to get it to rank for specific keywords, but you can also try and rank individual pages. Normally a site has links pointing to both the top level domain and individual pages. That is healthy and natural, and the same principles apply to pages as they do the top level domain. The only issue I see with your site is that there is no feed of recent blog posts on the home page. That is not a requirement, but it seems to help a lot.
Having trouble with your marketing? Wish you could have an experienced direct-to-fan marketing expert look over your actual campaigns, music, or content and offer feedback? Or perhaps you’re just looking for a little one-on-one assistance so you can ask questions that pertain to your specific goals and get a second, more experienced, perspective? Click here to book a session with me now.
John, that was over-the-top!
One of my frustrations has been that, since YouTube has greatly diminished as a traffic source for me due to their changes, I've been looking more and more to paid traffic sources. That's been ok, but it's expensive for me right now as I continue to work on ways to get my subscriber value up (I've now added house concerts to my followup series, and I am getting takers, so I expect that situation to improve).
I really haven't pursued search engine traffic because it just seemed so darn daunting. About the time I heard this new training, I had been looking at the google analytics for my http://www.charleylanger.net squeeze page, and--what do you know--I have been getting pretty consistent search engine traffic for a while now. It's small, only about 6 per day, but it's there all the time. That little squeeze page ranks #4 in google for "smooth jazz download." That didn't get me all that amped up until I listened to this training and realized: (1) I haven't even been trying to SEO that page, and (2) if I had 100 pages or so bringing in 6 visitors a day (very doable over the next few years), that would be a nice little subscriber farm.
Anyway, I just wanted to say thanks, and perhaps give some hope to people who think this SEO stuff is too hard. It's likely that I won't compete with the big boys on the big key words, but I can compete on the "long tailed" key words, and I can multiply a little until it becomes alot. That's kinda cool.
One more question for you. You say that sites with authority are better "votes" when it comes to backlinks. Are google-ranking videos good votes? It's not hard for me to get videos to rank. I'm just trying to figure out how I got a squeeze page on the front page of google. BTW, it's down to the #6 spot, but the sites ahead of me are all huge entitites. I'm the only artist there.
One more question for you. You say that sites with authority are better "votes" when it comes to backlinks. Are google-ranking videos good votes? It's not hard for me to get videos to rank. I'm just trying to figure out how I got a squeeze page on the front page of google. BTW, it's down to the #6 spot, but the sites ahead of me are all huge entitites. I'm the only artist there.
Thanks Charley,
Yes, any ranking propety is a good backlink. Often what an SEO expert does when trying to rank is just make a list of the top 20 sites ranking for every target keyword and then go out and try and get backlinks from those sites. Having a lot of videos linking back to you is good, but you really do want to vary links up a lot. I would try to do more than juts build 100 youtube links to you. That would seem unnatural.
And just to clarify, squeeze pages will rank occasionally, but it's tough and I wouldn't rely on that. I would build a blog out to mimic the functionality of a squeeze page, but have a lot more content and links to that content on the home page. This will be viewed much better in the serps. The low content sites that don't have multi-facited user opportunities (like squeeze pages) tend not to rank very well, or for that long.
I'm working on a theme for just this purpose as we speak. Hope to have it done within 2 weeks.
But MMM is a good example of this. The opt in form is undeniable. But it's still functionally a blog. That is the kind of site I would use if trying to create an authority site.
Having trouble with your marketing? Wish you could have an experienced direct-to-fan marketing expert look over your actual campaigns, music, or content and offer feedback? Or perhaps you’re just looking for a little one-on-one assistance so you can ask questions that pertain to your specific goals and get a second, more experienced, perspective? Click here to book a session with me now.
John Oszajca said
And just to clarify, squeeze pages will rank occasionally, but it's tough and I wouldn't rely on that. I would build a blog out to mimic the functionality of a squeeze page, but have a lot more content and links to that content on the home page. This will be viewed much better in the serps. The low content sites that don't have multi-facited user opportunities (like squeeze pages) tend not to rank very well, or for that long.
And building a blog site to mimic the functionality of a squeeze page is exactly what I am starting to work on. I had not been working on that simply because I was thinking that ranking was only possible for the big boys. And then I saw my squeeze page rank, and I thought, "Wow...this isn't going to be so hard after all."
Yeah, a lot of people seem to think that. But SEO is really pretty easy. If you use the low key approach outlined in the recent video and go after long tail keywords, it's really not hard at all. And in time it just gets easier and easier to rank as your site's authority goes up.
It could be as simple as spending one hour a day writing articles (you should be able to write two in that time) and then spend another hour publishing them and finding publishers.
One article a day to your site and one article a day on another site or a web 2.0 property. That's not the fastest route in teh world but fast forward a few years and you should have quite a lot of traffic.
And it gets addicting when you start to see your site move up in the serps.
Having trouble with your marketing? Wish you could have an experienced direct-to-fan marketing expert look over your actual campaigns, music, or content and offer feedback? Or perhaps you’re just looking for a little one-on-one assistance so you can ask questions that pertain to your specific goals and get a second, more experienced, perspective? Click here to book a session with me now.
Dang I'm pumped! Yeeeea!
Hey John:
I've been preparing to build an authority site of the type you described in this training, and I'm getting a little hung up on which keyphrases to optimize the site for, especially since I'd probably be trying to buy a URL with my phrase in it as Step 1 of the process.
I wondered if you wouldn't mind commenting specifically on my situation? My genre would probably be singer/songwriter, but with less country/americana vibe than it sounds like you're targeting - based on a little bit of market research and the results of a survey I sent to my list, my music would probably appeal to fans of Counting Crows, Elvis Costello, Tom Petty, The Wallflowers, etc.
As far as I can tell, this is a weird genre to optimize for, in that no one really seems to use "singer songwriter" as a search term, which leads me to believe that listeners don't actually think of their favorite musicians as "singer/songwriters".
None of the industry's other genre terms for these types of artists - Adult Alternative, Adult Contemporary, etc. - seem to stick in the average listener's mind, either. So if fans are searching for music, or information regarding their favorite music, what search terms are they using?
I've been trying to figure this out for weeks and still seem to be coming up empty (which probably means there's something fundamental that I'm not understanding about SEO ;).
Anyway, if you had any perspective to throw in here, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks!
P.S. Are there any examples of sites that you've come across that are already successfully taking this type of music niche authority content marketing approach?
"Radio Nowhere? What the hell is that? We wanted him to be a lawyer" — My Mom
Okay, so she didn't like it. But you just might! Loud guitars, award-winning songwriting, and visits from the devil.
Check it out and pick up a free EP here..
By the way, if anyone else has some insight on this, I'd love to get whatever contributions you might have, too. I've got a bunch of time this week to start building out the site, and can't wait to get started. Thoughts, experienced advice, wild-ass speculation - let's hear it!
"Radio Nowhere? What the hell is that? We wanted him to be a lawyer" — My Mom
Okay, so she didn't like it. But you just might! Loud guitars, award-winning songwriting, and visits from the devil.
Check it out and pick up a free EP here..
Awfully quiet in here...anyone? Bueller? 😉
"Radio Nowhere? What the hell is that? We wanted him to be a lawyer" — My Mom
Okay, so she didn't like it. But you just might! Loud guitars, award-winning songwriting, and visits from the devil.
Check it out and pick up a free EP here..
Hey Mike,
Sorry for the slow response. Been traveling. To my mind it's pretty straight forward. If I was trying to narrow down one big genre specific keyword i would start researching terms like singer songwriter (I do personally thing that fits), folk, alternative folk, country rock, etc, and just see where the research led me. Without looking into it, sticking with the singer songwriter idea would be where I would start if it were me. Remember, a lot of your search traffic is going to come from the long tail traffic that you pull in from your content.
I do know a number of people who are ranking for various keywords and doing well with it. One artist is ranking for a meditation related keyword and she is an Amazon best seller. She gets hundreds, sometimes thousands of visitors a day.
Let me know if you need any further clarification.
Having trouble with your marketing? Wish you could have an experienced direct-to-fan marketing expert look over your actual campaigns, music, or content and offer feedback? Or perhaps you’re just looking for a little one-on-one assistance so you can ask questions that pertain to your specific goals and get a second, more experienced, perspective? Click here to book a session with me now.
Thanks, John.
I've got a question about a particular aspect of having your keyphrase as part of your URL.
Let's say my ideal keyphrase was "american troubadour", but "american troubadours" was significantly less competitive. If I went with "americantroubadours.com" and diligently built my authority site, would I stand a good chance of ranking for "american troubadour" as well, because that keyphrase is contained within "americantroubadours.com"?
In other words, if you have the plural version of your keyphrase in your URL, will that also eventually help you rank for the singular version also?
Also, there seems to be significant disagreement out on the web over the value of different domain extensions for SEO. Do you have an opinion on the best way to go if .com/.net/.org are already taken?
Hope this all makes sense…
"Radio Nowhere? What the hell is that? We wanted him to be a lawyer" — My Mom
Okay, so she didn't like it. But you just might! Loud guitars, award-winning songwriting, and visits from the devil.
Check it out and pick up a free EP here..
Just testing something here - please ignore this post
"Radio Nowhere? What the hell is that? We wanted him to be a lawyer" — My Mom
Okay, so she didn't like it. But you just might! Loud guitars, award-winning songwriting, and visits from the devil.
Check it out and pick up a free EP here..
Mike Baker said
Thanks, John.I've got a question about a particular aspect of having your keyphrase as part of your URL.
Let's say my ideal keyphrase was "american troubadour", but "american troubadours" was significantly less competitive. If I went with "americantroubadours.com" and diligently built my authority site, would I stand a good chance of ranking for "american troubadour" as well, because that keyphrase is contained within "americantroubadours.com"?
In other words, if you have the plural version of your keyphrase in your URL, will that also eventually help you rank for the singular version also?
Also, there seems to be significant disagreement out on the web over the value of different domain extensions for SEO. Do you have an opinion on the best way to go if .com/.net/.org are already taken?
Hope this all makes sense…
I actually have a similar question. If I have "smooth jazz download" in my URL, will that help me, or possibly hurt me, with "jazz download?"
Just my two cents- adding an 's' for your keyword in the domain is perfectly fine. The main point is that you have your keyword in there and if possible - positioned closest to the beginning. So having http://www.americantroubadors.com is better than "www.bestamericantroubador.com".
Can I substantiate this? No.
I'll also chime in on the SEO searches that you're doing to find your genre. I think there are a lot of 'industry terms' that most people wouldn't think of. For example, when I interviewed John last year he slipped in a term called "active rock" that I had never heard of before relating to bands like Metallica who I would associate with "hard rock" or "metal" or even my particular fave "heavy rock".
I wouldn't be the least bit surprised that there are many industry terms that aren't used by the masses to find what they're looking for. However, it's still worth ranking for keywords like that if you're looking to work with industry people at some point like a booking agent, promoter, manager or an a/r rep - chances are they'll be searching under terms like that.
SEO is part art and part science. There are many keyword searches that come out of left field that are better then the ones most of use initially target. You'll find out which ones they are by using analytics and monitoring which keywords are sending your the best quality traffic.
Pick the best keyword(s) that you can and go from there and it will eventually come together for you.
Best of luck!