I was looking at the Dynamic Creative breakdown, and noticed the "combination" option. I don't remember if you covered that in the Copywriting course, but I don't think so. Is that not a good idea? Is it better to look at the individual assets and combine the cheapest ones, or would the cheapest combination potentially outperform a combination of the rest? Or would they mostly come out the same?
I didn't cover it because I don't personally use that. Nothing wrong with doing that though. I just tend to go a little bit wider with the ranges that I carry over to the next ad, and if I use combinations it narrows segments more.
Having trouble with your marketing? Wish you could have an experienced direct-to-fan marketing expert look over your actual campaigns, music, or content and offer feedback? Or perhaps you’re just looking for a little one-on-one assistance so you can ask questions that pertain to your specific goals and get a second, more experienced, perspective? Click here to book a session with me now.
OK, that makes sense. I was thinking maybe some copy could clash, so it might bypass that. I was just looking at a headline that I realized was perhaps not the best match for a certain bit of text - and both of those perform the best out of their ad set, but when I look at combination, I get the headline but a different bit of text... So I'm thinking maybe the combination would work better.
Of course, I could take both and split test them.
Yeah, that all makes sense. I just don't really use them that much and haven't bothered to change an approach that has been working for me, but I can see how the combos could help in certain situations.
Having trouble with your marketing? Wish you could have an experienced direct-to-fan marketing expert look over your actual campaigns, music, or content and offer feedback? Or perhaps you’re just looking for a little one-on-one assistance so you can ask questions that pertain to your specific goals and get a second, more experienced, perspective? Click here to book a session with me now.